Monday, May 4, 2009

Sarah Palin and the GOP

I read Jonathan Martin over at Politico and the backstabbing ease of what Mitt Romney said about Sarah Palin:

Romney’s quip reflects the deep unease among many in the GOP establishment about the continued high-profile of Limbaugh and especially Palin. There is almost a sense of exasperation among many party elites over the media coverage the two polarizing figures get – attention which, in Palin’s case, is widely seen as a product largely of her good looks and tabloid-fodder family troubles.

“She’s bigger in the media than in reality,” lamented GOP consultant Mike Murphy, a longtime friend and adviser to John McCain.

I am not a Romney cheerleader because he was, to me, one of the biggest phony’s out there during 2008, but he has a point.

Palin was praised for her gut wrenching diatribe of Barack Obama during the Republican Convention, in other words, she carried the water that John McCain refused to. She got points, but it was the unraveling of Palin, herself that was her worst nightmare.

There is no doubt that Palin appeared dumber than a box of rocks during the Katie Couric interview. One can say that Couric spewed gotcha questions, when in reality she did not, since when is asking a political candidate what type of materials you read on a daily basis a gotcha question? That was Palin's downfall, right then. The vote was held out on her because no one knew who she was, but the minute she opened her mouth, many felt we don't need THAT in the White House.

So, now the GOP is on a listening tour, asking Americans questions about their lives and the difficulties of the day to day challenges. I am glad they are finally doing this, but is it too late? The main problem is that the GOP has wrapped their whole existence to social issues, which in reality the public has rebuked. The public does not want government to tell us who to marry, if we should have a child, litmus tests for our being. These are none of your damn business questions for many Americans, which the GOP did not get until their party went down in flames in 2008.

Mitt Romney has his own can of worms within his party and if he ever wants the nomination he needs to edit to the left and middle. Meaning let the religious right wing of his party go and talk to moderates and independents. Let's face it, the religious right wing of the Republican Party will never nominate Romney, they don't trust him or his religion, which is the problem here.

And Sarah Palin? My take is this, she came to the lower 48, has never been to most of America, found it fascinating and she loved it. It was hard going back to Alaska, for her, which seems mundane after the glitz and glam of everywhere else. She is striving to maintain and remain relevant in a party from Alaska, but that is a hard task. She, as Romney, have major challenges, one is to smarten her image up. That Couric interview labeled her dumber than a box of rocks. She had the challenge to bring women and independents in the fold, but ran them off to Obama with her rhetoric and lack of knowledge. She has a lot of work to do, meaning she needs to learn to talk mainstream and not extreme. That is her challenge.

The GOP has a lot of work to do, they acknowledges this and knows it. National elections are won in the middle, not from your own party. If you cannot win moderates and independents, no matter which party, you will lose. As long as the GOP is galvanized by the Limbaughs of their own party and don't have the strength to take it back, they will continue to roam in the wilderness for a very long time.

Home Page

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
You don't think Couric played gotcha? Asking Palin what McCain did to regulate the financial industry "other than" what he did on regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is like asking Mrs. Lincoln, "Other than the assassination, how else did you like the play?" Also, asking her the same question FOUR TIMES and then using her final (understandably exasperated and undetailed) response as the response actually aired is irresponsible, at best, and sinister at worst. The question "What do you read?" suggested that she doesn't read at all and she was understandably unwilling to answer it. I could go on. Meanwhile, the rest of the left-wing media jumped on every misstatement Palin made and set her apart as the object of ridicule. Obama's claim that there are 57 states in America, that his uncle helped liberate Auschwitz, that a tornado annihilated an entire town in the MidWest, etc., were IGNORED. Biden's statement in his interview with Couric that FDR "went on television" in response to the stock market crash (Hoover was president then) was IGNORED. She was crucified, plain and simple. She is a brilliant woman who is now seen, thanks to merciless attacking by the media, as an idiot. It's straight out of the playbook Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals -- a liberal rule book. Hillary Clinton wrote her Wellesley thesis on it. Please. Stop with the double standards.
You can not have your cake and eat it too!

Since when has "what do you read" is a gotcha question? And Couric was kind in asking her more than once? When you step on the national stage, you must be ready for any and everything. And when you decide to sit down with a major journalist, you better have the answers correct. Can anyone forget the pose of Palin talking about Putin's little head swirling over Alaska? I mean, come on. She was so not ready for any of it. Make sure the next person you put on stage is up for the game, she definitely was not. And to refresh your memory here: http://thisweekwithbarackobama.blogspot.com/2008/... and what Fareed Zakaria said here: http://thisweekwithbarackobama.blogspot.com/2008/...

Sorry she did this to herself, with no help from the McCain Campaign.
Sorry to disagree with gocatholic, but I live in Alaska. Ms. Palin is not a brilliant woman; she was elected because of the dirty ethics of the Republicans (she presented herself as ethical) & because of the arrogance of our former governor. She has her own ethical problems (like troopergate). She is a politician & she has delivered on some promises & failed on others. Her own Republican legislators complain that it is hard to get her attention. While she still has good polls in this state, most of the Republicans I talk to won't vote for her again if she runs for Governor & wouldn't vote for her if she ran for national office. I watched Katie Couric's interview & I could answer more questions than Ms. Palin.
sorry - I had to break this into two parts:
The Russian remark was silly; when the Russians fly close to Alaska (they do on occasion), it's the US Air Force that deters them--Palin has nothing to do with that. She will be informed, probably after the fact; she is not involved in the day-to-day operations of our national guard either, many of whom are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan anyway. Ms. Palin has one or two positions on which she has staked her claim--"drill baby drill" which is popular in Alaska--an oil producing state, & "prolife and abstinence" which she has contradicted several times in national speeches. She has said more than once, that Bristol "chose" to keep her baby & she herself "chose" to keep Trig after a momentary fleeting thought. Sarah Palin is an interesting woman who works hard & tries hard, but she is not brilliant nor is she suited for national office.

Post a new comment

Comments by